Apu (APU) Rose 230.0% on a Pool Only 0.4 Hours Old, Before Any Trading History Exists

Participation Event

In the last hour, Apu (APU) recorded a total of 3,482 transactions, marking a significant increase in trading activity compared to the period prior to its launch. The trading pair is only 0.4 hours old, meaning all price levels were established within this short timeframe, providing no historical context for the current price movement.

Price0.000385

1h change+230.0%

24h volume$931.3k

Liquidity$54.1k

Pool age22m old

Snapshot captured Oct 14, 2026 · View live chart →

Scalper risk score 56/100 Elevated

Elevated risk (56/100). The strongest contributor is pair maturity: The pair is 0.4 hours old. Most catastrophic failures happen in the first day, and there is no trading history to assess. Assessed on 6 of 8 components; liquidity lock, holder concentration unavailable.

Market readEvery price this token has traded at was set in the last 0.4 hours, so there is no prior range to measure the current one against.

Pair maturity: 0.4 hours
Volume vs liquidity: 17.2x
Liquidity depth: $54,083

6 of 8 components assessed · partial confidence · GoPlus

Full risk assessment and coverage for APU →

Transaction Breakdown

Out of the total transactions, there were 2,076 buy orders and 1,406 sell orders. This indicates a relatively balanced order flow, with approximately 40% of the transactions being sells.

Market Activity

The trading volume over the past 24 hours reached $931,287, which is 17.2 times the pool's liquidity of $54,083. This high volume relative to liquidity may suggest potential wash trading or automated trading activity.

Liquidity Profile

The current liquidity stands at $54,083, which is 14.1% of the market cap of $384,920. This liquidity level is workable for small positions, but larger orders may significantly impact the price.

Risk Note

The overall risk assessment indicates an elevated risk level due to the pair's maturity of only 0.4 hours, with no trading history available for analysis. This article does not constitute financial advice.